On September 29, 2012 stated in the
star news online the government had decided to reduce the subsidiary on sugar
by 20cents in Malaysia’s budget 2013 tabled by
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Tazak. It is said that the increase was caused by factors such as, natural
disasters in producing countries that cause the decreases in supply and also
global market price.
Our prime minister is
hoping that the business community will not take advantage of the increment and
burden the people by increasing the price of sugar but reduce the content of
sugar instead. It is said that this could be a positive change since lifestyle
related disease are mostly caused by excessive sugar consumptions, such as
diabetes and obesity. On the other hand, Wan Ahmad said
they could now act if businesses trying to manipulate the prices in order to
get more profit charging unreasonable price. With enough evidence, their
enforcement officers will take necessary actions against those who try to hijack
the price of sugar.
As it stated, there is a big amount of
positive comments on this change by the governments and it is said that it
benefit Malaysians lifestyle instead. Helping to decrease the ratio of diabetic
people. But again, what if consumers are willing to spend more instead of
cutting down? As said, the demand will change due to changes in the market, it
is hard to cut down on basic food product but people may reduce on consumption
of luxuries and branded ones. Besides, as a consumer myself, we know it well
enough how this increment will be the domino effect of price increment in all
kind of food and drinks. For example, mamak will increase their teh tarik price
by at least 20cents and even if you requested for less sugar, kurang manis. Same
goes to the price of bread, desserts and everything that contain sugar. In this
economy, no one will be willing to do loss business; it is always to maximize
profit for their own living. And what is there to blame when the government is
the one who increased the price. Some say, this small change will not make a
huge difference to our cost of living as it is estimated sugar price will only
cost about rm80 per month in a household. But what happens to the poor where
they have to budget for every thing they buy, they consume. More or less it
will affect the lower class level and caused them on a tight budget buying less
of sugar. Hereby, price elasticity appear as the demand is affected by the
changes of the price. And at the end of the day, we still need to pay tax and
pay more for what we eat and having less disposable income.
There are different types of example
for the demand of sugar, in the case of people that are having low sugar level;
they will value the product highly. These consumers will buy the quantity that
they will need even if the price is increased. But since they already capable
to have what they need and the correct amount they will not buy any much more
even if the price is lowered. In contrast, people that are having high sugar
level will buy the same amount of sugar that they usually consume no matter the
price increase or decrease. But certain consumers are very price sensitive,
they will tend to buy whatever is cheapest.
For businesses, there will be good and
there will be bad. Of course the profit they will be making is a positive
change, they can be having a pack of 1kg sugar price increase by 20cents and
the amount of sugar in a cup of milo increased by 20cents as well. But is this even
fair to the consumers? Government said it is not right if you increase the
price of a milo ais from rm1 to rm1.30 and you could be fined, but again which
means that a maximum of increment of 20cents is acceptable. Now that mentioned,
the amount is not reasonable to be measured at all. Moreover what happen to those that choose to
stay with the price that have been set earlier and decided to reduce the
content of sugar instead? Come to think of it, it is bad business. This will
affect the quality of whatever they are serving due to the necessity of what
the food may need. And this will lead to customers unsatisfactory causing a
loss in business. People will stop going for the usual and they will have to
search for a better option or perhaps to substitute sugar with other products.
For example, even with no change in sugar price, if there will be an abundant
growth of corn, the demand for sugar will decline. As corn syrup can be
substitute for sugar as sweetener. And when the demand decreases, the demand
curve will shift leftwards and it goes otherwise.
The changes in sugar affect in many
ways, either good or bad is depending of how you see it. For some, the demand
of sugar may decrease as it is good in a way to start looking up of one’s
health, as there is already a lot of pollution in the consumption of food and
beverages nowadays. But as for my own opinion, even with the change the demand
for sugar will not decrease if the reason given is for their own good with less
sugar consumptions as truth is Malaysians have been neglecting their health for
quite a long time. Also, the demand will not increase further since the price
has gone up now.
Posted by Calista Yee Pui Ching
Posted by Calista Yee Pui Ching
No comments:
Post a Comment